79
Department of State's message).
That would leave
except as defer 1.3 or fi 12 without any trading rights all pending the
conclusion of the later comprehensive treaties.
This
also would not be in accordance with the principles
of equality and reciprocity and, in the opinion of
H.M. G., should be resisted.
5. The Foreign Office have no objection to
the proposed amendment of Article 6 regarding the
places in which consular officers shall be permitted
to reside,
II
The Foreign Office would offer the following
commen on the various matters which the Chinese
Government wish to cover in an exchange of notes to
be added to the treaty.
System of treaty ports.
It is not clear what is meant by this. If the
Chinese Government intended to throw open the whole
country to foreign trade and residence instead of
confining foreigners to the treaty ports for these purposes, H.M.G. would welcome this change, which is
what they have asked for in Article 6 of the British
draft treaty. But it would seem that this is not the
intention of the Chinese Government and it is suggested
that the latter should be asked to elucidate the mean-
ing of this proposal.
Special Courts in the International Settlements at Shanghai and Anoy.
The right of the Chinese Government to abolish
these Courts would appear to be implicit in the treaty
as already drafted, but H.M.G. would have no objection
to covering the point explicitly in an exchange of
notes.
Coastal...
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.